|
HURRICANES KATRINA, RITA and WILMA
The RAA expresses its sympathy to all of
those in the Gulf Coast region and
offers support to the many first
responders in the region. In the months
ahead, untold numbers of insurance
company workers will be on site
assisting with economic recovery for the
many citizens with insurance coverage.
Reinsurers play an important role in
protecting their clients and helping to
restore a damaged economy and reinsurers
will be paying billions of dollars in
Hurricane Katrina claims. However, it
will take months and years to make a
final accounting for this catastrophic
event.
Hurricane Katrina Losses: Insured loss
estimates from Katrina, which range from
$15 billion to $60 billion, are highly
speculative at this point. Insurers are
still undertaking the process of
assessing the damage as search and
rescue took first priority. Several
analysts are now focusing on estimated
gross losses of $40 to $50 billion and
projecting individual company losses
from that target. A.M. Best has listed
$30 billion in losses as reported by
individual insurers. It is notable that
this estimate would make this the
largest insured loss ever, even greater
than the projected $35 billion in
September 11 losses.
Katrina caused an enormous amount of
flood damage, which means that the
National Flood Insurance Program may pay
for a higher share of hurricane damage
than otherwise would be expected.
Although home insurance policies do not
cover flood losses, many commercial
policies do provide some flooding
protection. From press reports, flood
losses appear to be greatest in southern
Louisiana and on the Mississippi and
Alabama gulf coast due to the reported
25-foot storm surge. Lawsuits have now
been filed in Louisiana and Mississippi
seeking to override home insurance flood
exclusions.
In addition to the large amount of
protracted flooding, Katrina’s loss
picture may be different from other
hurricanes. Insurers are assessing
damage to offshore oil platforms and
environmental contamination in the
greater New Orleans area. Other
variables include the large number of
flooded cars, the extensive damage to
transportation infrastructure, the
unique shut down of the greater New
Orleans area, and the effect that will
have on the business interruption line
of insurance.
Hurricanes Rita and Wilma Losses:
Initial estimates of insured losses
range from $2.5 to $7 billion dollars.
Very early estimates of losses for
Hurricane Wilma now range from $6
billion to $10 billion. As with Katrina
and Rita, it will take time for
insurance adjusters to assess the damage
and for the extent of individual company
and aggregate industry losses.
Reinsurer Losses: For natural disaster
losses, reinsurers typically pay on an
aggregate basis between 25% and 30% of
the gross losses. The larger the loss
event, the greater the share that is
passed on to reinsurers; thus, as
Katrina’s loss estimates rise, the
percentage share paid by reinsurers will
grow substantially. It is generally
reported that reinsurers paid 60% or
more of the 9/11 insured losses.
Analysts are now projecting that
reinsurers will pay about 60% of
Katrina’s insured losses. The amount
reinsured depends on the market share of
insurers in the region and their
propensity to use reinsurance. Purchase
of reinsurance is voluntary and some
insurers choose to keep all such losses
for their own account; other insurers
have business models that rely upon
reinsurance. The share of an individual
insurer's loss that will be reimbursed
by reinsurance is variable and dependent
on that company's risk appetite and its
reinsurance purchasing decisions.
Reinsurer Capital: Standard and Poor’s
estimates that the global reinsurance
industry had $160 billion in capital at
yearend 2004. The firm estimates that if
insurance industry losses total $50
billion, that reinsurers capital could
decrease by 12% after consideration of
earnings to date, tax offsets, dividend
payments and capital raising activities.
S & P estimates that reinsurers have
raised $4.5 billion in capital post
Katrina. The recovery from this loss
level would take about three years.
Fitch Ratings estimates that reinsurers
could lose 4 to 8% of their capital and
expects capital to be replenished within
18 months.
Abundant Reinsurance Capacity: In recent
years, property catastrophe reinsurance
capacity has been abundant and in fact,
the 2004 Florida hurricanes did not lead
to a reduction in reinsurance capacity;
nor did they lead to a spike in
reinsurance costs. Property catastrophe
reinsurance pricing has remained stable-to-declining,
with modest increases for Florida
insurers. Market sources continue to
assess Katrina losses, but many expect
that this event will not constrain
reinsurance capacity.
In the industry trade press, reinsurance
brokers initially were quoted as saying
they expect that reinsurance markets
will remain stable and that Katrina’s
effect will be to prevent prices from
dropping in the soft market rather than
rising. More recent analyst reports and
press commentary point to the potential
for broad based increases in property
catastrophe reinsurance prices. Morgan
Stanley analysts recently commented that
reinsurers would have difficulty making
broad based price increases stick.
In September and October insurers begin
discussions with their individual
reinsurers on pricing and terms for the
big January 1 renewal season. More
information will be available on the
effect of Katrina on the insurance and
reinsurance markets in trade press
stories that will cover several major
industry conferences in September and
October.
Managing for Expected Losses: Hurricane
Andrew and the Northridge Earthquake
were paradigm-shifting events after
which insurers and reinsurers
reevaluated their business strategies
and revised coverages, pricing and
underwriting rules. Industry executives
now report that Hurricane Katrina may
also be a paradigm-shifting event
because of the extensive protracted
flooding, environmental contamination,
large wind-field pattern and
proportionally larger commercial lines
losses. One of the important outcomes of
Hurricane Andrew was the development of
more robust catastrophe modeling
products. Industry reliance on these
improved catastrophe models has brought
greater stability to reinsurance markets
|